Watch the Dallas Symposium LIVE, and fundraiser auction
Ticket proceeds support mindat.org! - click here...
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Anshu, Anurag, Arad, Itai, Jain, Aditya (2016) How local is the information in tensor networks of matrix product states or projected entangled pairs states. Physical Review B, 94 (19) doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.195143

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleHow local is the information in tensor networks of matrix product states or projected entangled pairs states
JournalPhysical Review B
AuthorsAnshu, AnuragAuthor
Arad, ItaiAuthor
Jain, AdityaAuthor
Year2016 (November 28)Volume94
Issue19
PublisherAmerican Physical Society (APS)
DOIdoi:10.1103/physrevb.94.195143Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID14243342Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:14243342:5
GUID0
Full ReferenceAnshu, Anurag, Arad, Itai, Jain, Aditya (2016) How local is the information in tensor networks of matrix product states or projected entangled pairs states. Physical Review B, 94 (19) doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.195143
Plain TextAnshu, Anurag, Arad, Itai, Jain, Aditya (2016) How local is the information in tensor networks of matrix product states or projected entangled pairs states. Physical Review B, 94 (19) doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.195143
In(2016, November) Physical Review B Vol. 94 (19) American Physical Society (APS)

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

Anshu, Anurag, Arad, Itai, Vidick, Thomas (2016) Simple proof of the detectability lemma and spectral gap amplification. Physical Review B, 93 (20) doi:10.1103/physrevb.93.205142
Schuch, Norbert, Pérez-García, David, Cirac, Ignacio (2011) Classifying quantum phases using matrix product states and projected entangled pair states. Physical Review B, 84 (16) doi:10.1103/physrevb.84.165139
Corboz, Philippe (2016) Variational optimization with infinite projected entangled-pair states. Physical Review B, 94 (3) doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.035133
Orús, Román (2014) A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states. Annals of Physics, 349. 117-158 doi:10.1016/j.aop.2014.06.013
Osorio Iregui, Juan, Troyer, Matthias, Corboz, Philippe (2017) Infinite matrix product states versus infinite projected entangled-pair states on the cylinder: A comparative study. Physical Review B, 96 (11) doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.115113
Ponsioen, Boris, Corboz, Philippe (2020) Excitations with projected entangled pair states using the corner transfer matrix method. Physical Review B, 101 (19) doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.195109
Bridgeman, Jacob C., Bartlett, Stephen D., Doherty, Andrew C. (2017) Tensor networks with a twist: Anyon-permuting domain walls and defects in projected entangled pair states. Physical Review B, 96 (24) doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.245122
Vanderstraeten, Laurens, Haegeman, Jutho, Corboz, Philippe, Verstraete, Frank (2016) Gradient methods for variational optimization of projected entangled-pair states. Physical Review B, 94 (15) doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.155123
Molnar, Andras, Schuch, Norbert, Verstraete, Frank, Cirac, J. Ignacio (2015) Approximating Gibbs states of local Hamiltonians efficiently with projected entangled pair states. Physical Review B, 91 (4) doi:10.1103/physrevb.91.045138
Binder, Moritz, Barthel, Thomas (2015) Minimally entangled typical thermal states versus matrix product purifications for the simulation of equilibrium states and time evolution. Physical Review B, 92 (12) doi:10.1103/physrevb.92.125119
Murg, V., Verstraete, F., Cirac, J. I. (2009) Exploring frustrated spin systems using projected entangled pair states. Physical Review B, 79 (19) doi:10.1103/physrevb.79.195119
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: August 17, 2025 03:57:59
Go to top of page