Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Calcite vs. Perovskite
This match of heavy hitters is bound to end in heartbreak as classic calcite faces off against futuristic perovskite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Main, Ian (2017) Scale-model seismicity—Taking the rough with the smooth. Geology, 45 (9) 859-860 doi:10.1130/focus092017.1

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleScale-model seismicity—Taking the rough with the smooth
JournalGeology
AuthorsMain, IanAuthor
Year2017 (September 1)Volume45
Issue9
PublisherGeological Society of America
DOIdoi:10.1130/focus092017.1Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID143410Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:143410:5
GUID0
Full ReferenceMain, Ian (2017) Scale-model seismicity—Taking the rough with the smooth. Geology, 45 (9) 859-860 doi:10.1130/focus092017.1
Plain TextMain, Ian (2017) Scale-model seismicity—Taking the rough with the smooth. Geology, 45 (9) 859-860 doi:10.1130/focus092017.1
In(2017, September) Geology Vol. 45 (9) Geological Society of America

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

(2010) Taking the Rough with the Smooth. Science, 328 (5982). 1071 doi:10.1126/science.328.5982.1071-b
Chuang, Lindsay, Bostock, Michael, Wech, Aaron, Plourde, Alexandre (2017) Plateau subduction, intraslab seismicity, and the Denali (Alaska) volcanic gap. Geology, 45 (7) 647-650 doi:10.1130/g38867.1
Henderson, Jeremy, Main, Ian (1992) A simple fracture-mechanical model for the evolution of seismicity. Geophysical Research Letters, 19 (4) 365-368 doi:10.1029/92gl00274
Dias, Oscar J. C., Reall, Harvey S., Santos, Jorge E. (2018) Strong cosmic censorship: taking the rough with the smooth. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2018. doi:10.1007/jhep10(2018)001
Szumiata, T., Gzik-Szumiata, M. (2010) Model of Anisotropic Electrical Resistivity in Rough Thin Films. Acta Physica Polonica A, 118 (5). 859-860 doi:10.12693/aphyspola.118.859
Harbord, Christopher W.A., Nielsen, Stefan B., De Paola, Nicola, Holdsworth, Robert E. (2017) Earthquake nucleation on rough faults. Geology, 45 (10) 931-934 doi:10.1130/g39181.1
(2002) Erratum. Geology, 30 (9) 859 doi:10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<0859:e>2.0.co;2
VOGT, P. R. (1985) Marine Geology: The Geology of the Atlantic Ocean. Science, 228 (4701). 859-860 doi:10.1126/science.228.4701.859
Platt, John (2017) Persistent slip rate discrepancies in the eastern California (USA) shear zone: Comment. Geology, 45 (9) doi:10.1130/g39345c.1
Kane, M. F., Hildenbrand, T. G., Hendricks, J. D. (1981) Model for the tectonic evolution of the Mississippi embayment and its contemporary seismicity. Geology, 9 (12) 563 doi:10.1130/0091-7613(1981)9<563:mftteo>2.0.co;2
Beranek, Luke P. (2017) A magma-poor rift model for the Cordilleran margin of western North America. Geology, 45 (12) 1115-1118 doi:10.1130/g39265.1
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 4, 2025 16:37:59
Go to top of page