Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Stibnite vs. Okenite
It's a battle of dark and light as soft, dramatic stibnite goes up against adorable cottonballs of Okenite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Marcillo, Andrea, Baca Cabrera, Juan C., Widdig, Anja, Birkemeyer, Claudia (2023) A comparison between mobile and stationary gas chromatography–mass spectrometry devices for analysis of complex volatile profiles. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 415 (1) 137-155 doi:10.1007/s00216-022-04391-y

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleA comparison between mobile and stationary gas chromatography–mass spectrometry devices for analysis of complex volatile profiles
JournalAnalytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
AuthorsMarcillo, AndreaAuthor
Baca Cabrera, Juan C.Author
Widdig, AnjaAuthor
Birkemeyer, ClaudiaAuthor
Year2023 (January)Volume415
Issue1
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
DOIdoi:10.1007/s00216-022-04391-ySearch in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID16458568Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:16458568:3
GUID0
Full ReferenceMarcillo, Andrea, Baca Cabrera, Juan C., Widdig, Anja, Birkemeyer, Claudia (2023) A comparison between mobile and stationary gas chromatography–mass spectrometry devices for analysis of complex volatile profiles. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 415 (1) 137-155 doi:10.1007/s00216-022-04391-y
Plain TextMarcillo, Andrea, Baca Cabrera, Juan C., Widdig, Anja, Birkemeyer, Claudia (2023) A comparison between mobile and stationary gas chromatography–mass spectrometry devices for analysis of complex volatile profiles. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 415 (1) 137-155 doi:10.1007/s00216-022-04391-y
In(2023, January) Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Vol. 415 (1) Springer Science and Business Media LLC


See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 2, 2025 06:49:14
Go to top of page