Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Kosmochlor vs. Azurite
It's a battle of green vs blue as rare but vibrant chromium-bearing kosmochlor up against the deep blue copper alteration mineral azurite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Zhu, Yu; Zhou, Zhengbing; Wen, Hanjie; Liu, Ling; Yang, Dongguang; Xu, Lin; Liu, Tiantian; Yang, Shuang (2025) Trace element geochemistry and genetic implications of sphalerite and pyrite from the Lower Cambrian Dahebian stratiform barite deposit and its associated deep-seated sulfide mineralization, South China. Ore Geology Reviews, 181. 106621 doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2025.106621

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleTrace element geochemistry and genetic implications of sphalerite and pyrite from the Lower Cambrian Dahebian stratiform barite deposit and its associated deep-seated sulfide mineralization, South China
JournalOre Geology Reviews
AuthorsZhu, YuAuthor
Zhou, ZhengbingAuthor
Wen, HanjieAuthor
Liu, LingAuthor
Yang, DongguangAuthor
Xu, LinAuthor
Liu, TiantianAuthor
Yang, ShuangAuthor
Year2025Volume<   181   >
Page(s)106621
URL
DOIdoi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2025.106621Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Classification
Not set
LoC
Not set
Mindat Ref. ID18310577Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:18310577:0
GUID0
Full ReferenceZhu, Yu; Zhou, Zhengbing; Wen, Hanjie; Liu, Ling; Yang, Dongguang; Xu, Lin; Liu, Tiantian; Yang, Shuang (2025) Trace element geochemistry and genetic implications of sphalerite and pyrite from the Lower Cambrian Dahebian stratiform barite deposit and its associated deep-seated sulfide mineralization, South China. Ore Geology Reviews, 181. 106621 doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2025.106621
Plain TextZhu, Yu; Zhou, Zhengbing; Wen, Hanjie; Liu, Ling; Yang, Dongguang; Xu, Lin; Liu, Tiantian; Yang, Shuang (2025) Trace element geochemistry and genetic implications of sphalerite and pyrite from the Lower Cambrian Dahebian stratiform barite deposit and its associated deep-seated sulfide mineralization, South China. Ore Geology Reviews, 181. 106621 doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2025.106621
InLink this record to the correct parent record (if possible)
Abstract/NotesThe southeastern margin of the Yangtze Block hosts significant stratiform barite deposits within the early Cambrian black shales. Various models, including submarine exhalative hydrothermal activity, cold seep, and biological enrichment, have been proposed to explain their genetic types. Recently, substantial Zn-Pb-Fe sulfide ores mainly hosted by the Doushantuo Formation were discovered beneath the early Cambrian stratiform barite ores. The sulfide and barite ores along this belt demonstrated a common characteristic of close spatial relationship; however, it remains unclear whether a genetic relationship also exists. Nevertheless, this shed newly light on to decoding the genetic mechanism of massive barite deposition during this period. The mineralogy and trace element concentrations of sphalerite and pyrite in both deep-seated sulfide ores and stratiform barite ores at the Dahebian region were determined in this study. Hyalophane intergrown with apatite was frequently observed in both types of ores. This association contrasts with the Mississippi Valley Type (MVT) zinc-lead mineralization hosted in the Qinxudong Formation within this region, where apatite is predominantly surrounded by hydrothermal calcite. Furthermore, a covariant trend of minor concentrations of sphalerite and/or pyrite has been observed between sulfide ores and barite ores, indicating their precipitation within evolving hydrothermal fluids. This observation is corroborated by the decreasing temperatures of sphalerite during precipitation: the early-stage sulfide mineralization, late-stage mineralization, and stratiform barite deposit have recorded hydrothermal fluid temperatures in the ranges of 109 °C to 235 °C, 99 °C to 231 °C, and 38 °C to 199 °C, respectively. Furthermore, a comparable decreasing trend in sulfur fugacities was observed during the transition from sulfide to barite ore mineralization. The elevated concentrations of Ni, Cu, Se, and V in the late-stage pyrite of deep-seated sulfide deposits suggest that anoxic-euxinic bottom seawater infiltration along extensional faults likely facilitated mineralization. The enhanced influx of infiltrating seawater into mineralization zones significantly reduced the temperature of hydrothermal fluids, leading to a decrease in the rates of thermochemical sulfate reduction. Therefore, it can be reasonably inferred that the sulfide ore underlying the stratiform barite ores likely originated from sedimentary exhalative hydrothermal fluids. The Zn-Pb-Fe sulfide ores, which are deeply seated, underwent mineralization within the feeder zone at depth. Conversely, the stratiform barite deposits represent the uppermost expression of sedimentary-exhalative mineralization. These findings collectively suggest intense venting of Zn-Pb-Fe-Ba-bearing hydrothermal fluids into the rift basin along the southeastern margin of the Yangtze Block during the early Cambrian period.

Map of Localities

Locality Pages

LocalityCitation Details
Dahebian Mine, Tianzhu County, Qiandongnan, Guizhou, China

Mineral Occurrences

LocalityMineral(s)
Dahebian Mine, Tianzhu County, Qiandongnan, Guizhou, China Apatite, Baryte, Bitumen, Black shale, Breccia, Calcite, Chalcopyrite, Chert, Dolomite, Dolostone, Galena, Hyalophane, Limestone, Marcasite, Microcline, Petroleum, Pyrite, Quartz, Rutile, Shale, Siltstone, Sphalerite, Stibnite, Witherite


See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 9, 2025 01:32:41
Go to top of page