Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Sanidine vs. Hematite
It's a pair of often-overlooked classics as potassium feldspar sanidine competes with iron ore hematite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Bulman, O. M. B. (1951) Notes on Thecal Variation in Monograptus. Geological Magazine, 88 (5) 316-328 doi:10.1017/s0016756800069752

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleNotes on Thecal Variation in Monograptus
JournalGeological Magazine
AuthorsBulman, O. M. B.Author
Year1951 (October)Volume88
Issue5
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP)
DOIdoi:10.1017/s0016756800069752
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID248082Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:248082:8
GUID0
Full ReferenceBulman, O. M. B. (1951) Notes on Thecal Variation in Monograptus. Geological Magazine, 88 (5) 316-328 doi:10.1017/s0016756800069752
Plain TextBulman, O. M. B. (1951) Notes on Thecal Variation in Monograptus. Geological Magazine, 88 (5) 316-328 doi:10.1017/s0016756800069752
In(1951, October) Geological Magazine Vol. 88 (5) Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Abstract/NotesAbstractThecal modifications in certain Monograptids are discussed on a basis of restorations which distinguish the theca from the remainder of the “thecal segment” of Törnquist. There seems little support in those bi-form Monograptids examined for the view that the less modified thecae reflect an incomplete development, and in general the new thecal types appear to represent transformations which commonly originate proximally or at least are more highly developed proximally. A possible analogy between this colonial development and metamerism is suggested.


See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 7, 2025 08:59:45
Go to top of page