| Reference Type | Journal (article/letter/editorial) |
|---|
| Title | The Miocene/Oligocene Boundary and the Use of the Term Aquitanian |
|---|
| Journal | Geological Magazine |
|---|
| Authors | Eames, F. E. | Author |
|---|
| Year | 1953 (December) | Volume | 90 |
|---|
| Issue | 6 |
|---|
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
|---|
| DOI | doi:10.1017/s0016756800065900 |
|---|
| Generate Citation Formats |
|---|
| Mindat Ref. ID | 248314 | Long-form Identifier | mindat:1:5:248314:0 |
|---|
|
| GUID | 0 |
|---|
| Full Reference | Eames, F. E. (1953) The Miocene/Oligocene Boundary and the Use of the Term Aquitanian. Geological Magazine, 90 (6) 388-392 doi:10.1017/s0016756800065900 |
|---|
| Plain Text | Eames, F. E. (1953) The Miocene/Oligocene Boundary and the Use of the Term Aquitanian. Geological Magazine, 90 (6) 388-392 doi:10.1017/s0016756800065900 |
|---|
| In | (1953, December) Geological Magazine Vol. 90 (6) Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
|---|
| Abstract/Notes | AbstractIt is considered that some fossils, e.g. Orbulina and Miogypsina, are good indicators that beds containing them are of post-Oligocene age, and that the ages of some beds in certain parts of the world require reconsideration; mention is made of successions in Morocco, Venezuela, and Peru. It is recommended that the use of the term āAquitanianā be restricted to beds of basal Miocene age. |
|---|
These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.
