Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Sanidine vs. Hematite
It's a pair of often-overlooked classics as potassium feldspar sanidine competes with iron ore hematite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Kaufman, Alan J., Knoll, Andrew H., Semikhatov, Mikhail A., Grotzinger, John P., Jacobsen, Stein B., Adams, William (1996) Integrated chronostratigraphy of Proterozoic–Cambrian boundary beds in the western Anabar region, northern Siberia. Geological Magazine, 133 (5) 509-533 doi:10.1017/s0016756800007810

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleIntegrated chronostratigraphy of Proterozoic–Cambrian boundary beds in the western Anabar region, northern Siberia
JournalGeological Magazine
AuthorsKaufman, Alan J.Author
Knoll, Andrew H.Author
Semikhatov, Mikhail A.Author
Grotzinger, John P.Author
Jacobsen, Stein B.Author
Adams, WilliamAuthor
Year1996 (September)Volume133
Issue5
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP)
DOIdoi:10.1017/s0016756800007810Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID257080Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:257080:2
GUID0
Full ReferenceKaufman, Alan J., Knoll, Andrew H., Semikhatov, Mikhail A., Grotzinger, John P., Jacobsen, Stein B., Adams, William (1996) Integrated chronostratigraphy of Proterozoic–Cambrian boundary beds in the western Anabar region, northern Siberia. Geological Magazine, 133 (5) 509-533 doi:10.1017/s0016756800007810
Plain TextKaufman, Alan J., Knoll, Andrew H., Semikhatov, Mikhail A., Grotzinger, John P., Jacobsen, Stein B., Adams, William (1996) Integrated chronostratigraphy of Proterozoic–Cambrian boundary beds in the western Anabar region, northern Siberia. Geological Magazine, 133 (5) 509-533 doi:10.1017/s0016756800007810
In(1996, September) Geological Magazine Vol. 133 (5) Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Abstract/NotesAbstractCarbonate-rich sedimentary rocks of the western Anabar region, northern Siberia, preserve an exceptional record of evolutionary and biogeochemical events near the Proterozoic/Cambrian boundary. Sedimentologically, the boundary succession can be divided into three sequences representing successive episodes of late transgressive to early highstand deposition; four parasequences are recognized in the sequence corresponding lithostratigraphically to the Manykai Formation. Small shelly fossils are abundant and include many taxa that also occur in standard sections of southeastern Siberia. Despite this coincidence of faunal elements, biostratigraphic correlations between the two regions have been controversial because numerous species that first appear at or immediately above the basal Tommotian boundary in southeastern sections have first appearances scattered through more than thirty metres of section in the western Anabar. Carbon- and Sr-isotopic data on petrographically and geochemically screened samples collected at one- to two-metre intervals in a section along the Kotuikan River, favour correlation of the Staraya Reckha Formation and most of the overlying Manykai Formation with sub-Tommotian carbonates in southeastern Siberia. In contrast, isotopic data suggest that the uppermost Manykai Formation and the basal 26 m of the unconformably overlying Medvezhya Formation may have no equivalent in the southeast; they appear to provide a sedimentary and palaeontological record of an evolutionarily significant time interval represented in southeastern Siberia only by the sub-Tommotian unconformity. Correlations with radiometrically dated horizons in the Olenek and Kharaulakh regions of northern Siberia suggest that this interval lasted approximately three to six million years, during which essentially all 'basal Tommotian' small shelly fossils evolved.


See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 7, 2025 04:30:08
Go to top of page