(1997) DISCUSSION Discussion of glacial or non-glacial origin for the Bigganjargga tillite, Finnmark, northern Norway. Geological Magazine, 134 (6) 873-876 doi:10.1017/s0016756897007607

Reference Type | Journal (article/letter/editorial) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Title | DISCUSSION Discussion of glacial or non-glacial origin for the Bigganjargga tillite, Finnmark, northern Norway | ||
Journal | Geological Magazine | ||
Year | 1997 (November) | Volume | 134 |
Issue | 6 | ||
Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) | ||
DOI | doi:10.1017/s0016756897007607Search in ResearchGate | ||
Generate Citation Formats | |||
Mindat Ref. ID | 257511 | Long-form Identifier | mindat:1:5:257511:1 |
GUID | 0 | ||
Full Reference | (1997) DISCUSSION Discussion of glacial or non-glacial origin for the Bigganjargga tillite, Finnmark, northern Norway. Geological Magazine, 134 (6) 873-876 doi:10.1017/s0016756897007607 | ||
Plain Text | (1997) DISCUSSION Discussion of glacial or non-glacial origin for the Bigganjargga tillite, Finnmark, northern Norway. Geological Magazine, 134 (6) 873-876 doi:10.1017/s0016756897007607 | ||
In | (1997, November) Geological Magazine Vol. 134 (6) Cambridge University Press (CUP) | ||
Abstract/Notes | M. B. Edwards comments: Of all the geological occurrences he had seen, this was the most remarkable and revealing. For him it was a spiritual place, and the journey was a pilgrimage; he used this word himself. This was now the seventh time he was making this journey. Thus wrote Rosendahl (1945, p. 22; my translation from Norwegian) about the geologist Sederholm. Decades later, after dozens more publications of innumerable additional outcrops, the âReusch's Moraineâ exposure of upper Proterozoic glacial tillite resting on a glacially striated pavement (Reusch, 1891) remains unique and significant.Writing about this exposure, Jensen & Wulff-Pedersen (1996) concluded âThere is no evidence for glacial origin or contribution for the diamictite materialâ (p. 137) in the Bigganjargga tillite. This discussion explains why I disagree with their conclusions. |
See Also
These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() |