Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Cuprosklodowskite vs. Ikaite
It's radioactive #cuprosklodowskite vs ephemeral #ikaite for today's match.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

(1916) V.—The Structure and Later Geological History of New Zealand. Geological Magazine, S. 6 Vol. 3 (7) 314-320 doi:10.1017/s0016756800204123

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleV.—The Structure and Later Geological History of New Zealand
JournalGeological Magazine
Year1916 (July)Series:Volume6:3
Issue7
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP)
DOIdoi:10.1017/s0016756800204123
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID264857Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:264857:0
GUID0
Full Reference(1916) V.—The Structure and Later Geological History of New Zealand. Geological Magazine, S. 6 Vol. 3 (7) 314-320 doi:10.1017/s0016756800204123
Plain Text(1916) V.—The Structure and Later Geological History of New Zealand. Geological Magazine, S. 6 Vol. 3 (7) 314-320 doi:10.1017/s0016756800204123
In(1916, July) Geological Magazine S. 6 Vol. 3 (7) Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Abstract/NotesSupported by the great weight of Hutton's authority, his views, with which those of Haast and the early views of Hector were in general agreement, have gained wide acceptance, notwithstanding the opposition of McKay. Marshall, for example, as late as 1911 wrote as follows: “The great elevation [Mesozoic orogenic movement] was succeeded by nearly as great a depression. The majestic mountain ranges were gradually lowered until nothing but a chain of islands showed above sea level. To what a great extent this movement prevailed is seen at Lake Te Anau, where the Oamaru formation, some 3,000 feet thick, rises to the tops of the mountains. At Wakatipu and in the Rangitata valley the Oamaru rocks are found in the recesses of the mountains. In the Trelissick basin and between the masses of the Kaikoura ranges there was deep water. The valleys of the tributaries of the Buller are filled with Oamaru sediments.”


See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 14, 2025 17:14:16
Go to top of page