| Reference Type | Journal (article/letter/editorial) |
|---|
| Title | II.—The Age of the Morte Slate Fossils |
|---|
| Journal | Geological Magazine |
|---|
| Year | 1897 (March) | Series:Volume | 4:4 |
|---|
| Issue | 3 |
|---|
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
|---|
| DOI | doi:10.1017/s0016756800183694 |
|---|
| Generate Citation Formats |
|---|
| Mindat Ref. ID | 265511 | Long-form Identifier | mindat:1:5:265511:0 |
|---|
|
| GUID | 0 |
|---|
| Full Reference | (1897) II.—The Age of the Morte Slate Fossils. Geological Magazine, S. 4 Vol. 4 (3) 105-109 doi:10.1017/s0016756800183694 |
|---|
| Plain Text | (1897) II.—The Age of the Morte Slate Fossils. Geological Magazine, S. 4 Vol. 4 (3) 105-109 doi:10.1017/s0016756800183694 |
|---|
| In | (1897, March) Geological Magazine S. 4 Vol. 4 (3) Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
|---|
| Abstract/Notes | In the last number of the Geological Magazine Dr. J. W. Gregory has undertaken to give an opinion on the whole of the fossils described by me from the Morte Slates in the Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of May, 1896. He says he has been tempted to do this because someone had “recently read to the Geological Society of Cornwall” a paper in which he “assumes the Silurian age of the Morte Slates to be so well established that it may be accepted as the basis for future work.” Clearly this was too much for Dr. Gregory, and his righteous indignation compelled him at once to endeavour to put a stop to any such assumption. I do not, however, think that I shall have much difficulty in showing that Dr. Gregory's facts and conclusions are unreliable, and show a want of care and discrimination. |
|---|
These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.
