Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Kosmochlor vs. Azurite
It's a battle of green vs blue as rare but vibrant chromium-bearing kosmochlor up against the deep blue copper alteration mineral azurite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Rastall, R. H. (1920) Differentiation and Ore-deposits. Geological Magazine, 57 (7) 290-299 doi:10.1017/s0016756800101864

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleDifferentiation and Ore-deposits
JournalGeological Magazine
AuthorsRastall, R. H.Author
Year1920 (July)Volume57
Issue7
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP)
DOIdoi:10.1017/s0016756800101864
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID279915Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:279915:9
GUID0
Full ReferenceRastall, R. H. (1920) Differentiation and Ore-deposits. Geological Magazine, 57 (7) 290-299 doi:10.1017/s0016756800101864
Plain TextRastall, R. H. (1920) Differentiation and Ore-deposits. Geological Magazine, 57 (7) 290-299 doi:10.1017/s0016756800101864
In(1920, July) Geological Magazine Vol. 57 (7) Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Abstract/NotesAT the present time most mining geologists appear to be in general agreement on the principle that primary ore-deposits are derived from igneous magmas. Furthermore, it is now almost universally recognized that the segregation and concentration of the metals and their compounds into payable ore-deposits is but part of a larger and more fundamental problem, namely, the differentiation of the igneous rocks, a problem which has exercised the ingenuity of petrologists for many years past and is still by no means solved. Unfortunately most of the speculations and theories put forward in explanation of these phenomena are in the main founded on facts and inferences derived from the study of the silicates; comparatively few petrologists have taken into account the behaviour of the oxidic and sulphidic compounds of the useful metals, which are commonly regarded in the light of rare and accidental constituents of the magma, rather than as having any particular bearing on the point at issue. The most notable exception to this general statement is Vogt, whose work on slags and ore-deposits is of an epoch-making character from the theoretical point of view, as well as of immense practical importance in smelting and blast-furnace practice. However, within the last few years great attention has been devoted by mining geologists to the subject of the genesis of ore-deposits, mainly because of its bearing on the question of persistence in depth or the replacement at lower levels of one ore by another, such as is known to occur in certain cases. It may be suggested, therefore, that the time has now come when it may be possible to attempt to combine the facts hitherto discovered along different lines of research into a coherent whole.


See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 9, 2025 06:37:46
Go to top of page