Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Stibnite vs. Okenite
It's a battle of dark and light as soft, dramatic stibnite goes up against adorable cottonballs of Okenite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Batchelor, Richard A., Kinnaird, Judith A. (1984) Gahnite compositions compared. Mineralogical Magazine, 48 (348) 425-429 doi:10.1180/minmag.1984.048.348.13

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleGahnite compositions compared
JournalMineralogical MagazineISSN0026-461X
AuthorsBatchelor, Richard A.Author
Kinnaird, Judith A.Author
Year1984 (September)Volume48
Issue348
PublisherMineralogical Society
Download URLhttps://rruff.info/doclib/MinMag/Volume_48/48-348-425.pdf+
DOIdoi:10.1180/minmag.1984.048.348.13Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID3649Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:3649:2
GUID0
Full ReferenceBatchelor, Richard A., Kinnaird, Judith A. (1984) Gahnite compositions compared. Mineralogical Magazine, 48 (348) 425-429 doi:10.1180/minmag.1984.048.348.13
Plain TextBatchelor, Richard A., Kinnaird, Judith A. (1984) Gahnite compositions compared. Mineralogical Magazine, 48 (348) 425-429 doi:10.1180/minmag.1984.048.348.13
In(1984, September) Mineralogical Magazine Vol. 48 (348) Mineralogical Society
Abstract/NotesAbstract
Blue-coloured gem-quality spinel from Nigeria was analysed by wet chemical methods (using atomic absorption spectrophotometry) and investigated by X-ray diffraction. The results showed it to be gahnite (unit cell dimension a=8.091Β±0.003 Γ…) containing 36.7% ZnO, 3.58% FeO, and 0.12% MgO. The spinel has an RI of 1.79 and density between 4.4 and 4.59. Broadening of the n[111] XRD reflections indicates a measure of compositional heterogeneity. The gahnite analyses were compared with compositions of zinc spinels from other parts of the world. The analyses cluster into two distinct groups, Mg-rich spinels of metamorphic origin and Mg-poor spinels (including the Nigerian gahnite) with igneous affinities. Diadochy seems to operate within the zinc spinel structure between (Zn + Mn) and (Fe + Mg).

Mineral Pages

MineralCitation Details
Gahnite

Mineral Occurrences

LocalityMineral(s)
Jema'A, Kaduna, Nigeriaβ“˜ Albite, β“˜ Gahnite, β“˜ Muscovite, β“˜ Quartz, β“˜ Schorl, β“˜ Tantalite


See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are Β© OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 2, 2025 13:02:53
Go to top of page