Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Kosmochlor vs. Azurite
It's a battle of green vs blue as rare but vibrant chromium-bearing kosmochlor up against the deep blue copper alteration mineral azurite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

(1999) Classics in physical geography revisited. Progress in Physical Geography, 23 (3). 425-428 doi:10.1191/030913399675014406

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleClassics in physical geography revisited
JournalProgress in Physical Geography
Year1999 (September 1)Volume23
Issue3
PublisherSAGE Publications
DOIdoi:10.1191/030913399675014406Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID4776483Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:4776483:3
GUID0
Full Reference(1999) Classics in physical geography revisited. Progress in Physical Geography, 23 (3). 425-428 doi:10.1191/030913399675014406
Plain Text(1999) Classics in physical geography revisited. Progress in Physical Geography, 23 (3). 425-428 doi:10.1191/030913399675014406
In(1999, September) Progress in Physical Geography Vol. 23 (3) SAGE Publications

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

Jones, P. D. (1999) Classics in physical geography revisited. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 23 (3). 425-428 doi:10.1177/030913339902300305
(1999) Classics in physical geography revisited. Progress in Physical Geography, 23 (2). 251-255 doi:10.1191/030913399674315179
Richards, P.W. (1999) Classics in physical geography revisited. Progress in Physical Geography, 23 (1). 111-114 doi:10.1191/030913399673618642
Wilby, R.L. (2000) Classics in physical geography revisited. Progress in Physical Geography, 24 (3). 379-383 doi:10.1191/030913300701542688
Bradley, C. (2006) Classics in physical geography revisited. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 30 (3). 394-398 doi:10.1191/0309133306pp488xx
Goudie, A.S. (1998) Classics in physical geography revisited. Progress in Physical Geography, 22 (2). 247-249 doi:10.1191/030913398670290497
Luckman, B.H. (2000) Classics in physical geography revisited. Progress in Physical Geography, 24 (1). 97-101 doi:10.1191/030913300677643035
Kent, M. (2000) Classics in physical geography revisited. Progress in Physical Geography, 24 (2). 253-260 doi:10.1191/030913300671448641
Kent, M. (2000) Classics in physical geography revisited. Progress in Physical Geography, 24 (2). 53-60 doi:10.1191/030913300760564661
Swingland, I.R. (2001) Classics in physical geography revisited. Progress in Physical Geography, 25 (1). 109-110 doi:10.1191/030913301669480854
Pressey, R. L. (2002) Classics in physical geography revisited. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 26 (3). 434-441 doi:10.1191/0309133302pp347xx
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are Β© OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 9, 2025 11:16:50
Go to top of page