Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Kosmochlor vs. Azurite
It's a battle of green vs blue as rare but vibrant chromium-bearing kosmochlor up against the deep blue copper alteration mineral azurite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Kerans, Charles (1983) Timing of emplacement of the Muskox intrusion: constraints from Coppermine homocline cover strata. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 20 (5) 673-683 doi:10.1139/e83-061

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleTiming of emplacement of the Muskox intrusion: constraints from Coppermine homocline cover strata
JournalCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences
AuthorsKerans, CharlesAuthor
Year1983 (May 1)Volume20
Issue5
PublisherCanadian Science Publishing
DOIdoi:10.1139/e83-061Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID477876Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:477876:3
GUID0
Full ReferenceKerans, Charles (1983) Timing of emplacement of the Muskox intrusion: constraints from Coppermine homocline cover strata. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 20 (5) 673-683 doi:10.1139/e83-061
Plain TextKerans, Charles (1983) Timing of emplacement of the Muskox intrusion: constraints from Coppermine homocline cover strata. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 20 (5) 673-683 doi:10.1139/e83-061
In(1983, May) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Vol. 20 (5) Canadian Science Publishing
Abstract/Notes The Muskox intrusion is a Middle Proterozoic shallow-level mafic–ultramafic layered intrusion in the northwest corner of the Bear Province of the Canadian Shield. The intrusion was emplaced into the Lower Proterozoic Akaitcho Group and Hepburn metamorphic–plutonic complex of the Wopmay orogen and overlying Middle Proterozoic Coppermine homocline strata. To date, radiometric, paleomagnetic, and geochemical evidence has produced only equivocal results concerning the age of the Muskox intrusion relative to overlying Coppermine River Group basalts and Mackenzie diabase dykes. Stratigraphic redefinition of and structural relationships to the cover sequence of the intrusion provide the best available evidence for the age of the Muskox intrusion.Although previously inferred to be a pre-Dismal Lakes Group structure, the Canoe Lake Fault is here shown to cross-cut Dismal Lakes strata with west-side-down displacement equivalent to that documented to the south where it offsets the intrusion. This relationship, supported by detailed mapping that shows that the Muskox intrusion intrudes units 11 and 12 of the Dismal Lakes Group, demonstrates a post-Dismal Lakes age for the intrusion. This conclusion strongly supports the contention that the Muskox intrusion and Coppermine River Group are coeval and comagmatic.Syndepositional uplift and normal faulting within uppermost Dismal Lakes Group strata were most pronounced near the exposed roof of the intrusion, and are interpreted to have been related to emplacement of a small sill-like body that probably was the precursor to the main intrusive event. At least 70 m of sediments was deposited after this initial disturbance, but before extrusion of the Coppermine River Group basalts (which heralded the main emplacement event). This thickness of sedimentary strata implies a period of several hundred thousand years between the two igneous events.These results support earlier contentions that the Mackenzie igneous event, comprising emplacement of Mackenzie dykes, Coppermine River Group basalts, and the Muskox intrusion, was a coherent mafic igneous event that occurred approximately 1200 Ma ago, with the Muskox intrusion as a locus.


See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 9, 2025 04:44:31
Go to top of page