Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Chrysotile vs. Pectolite
Two new minerals to launch this year's cup! Hazardous (but useful!) chrysotile faces off against stunning gem pectolite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Dimroth, Erich, Imreh, Lazlo, Goulet, Normand, Rocheleau, Michel (1983) Evolution of the south-central segment of the Archean Abitibi Belt, Quebec. Part II: Tectonic evolution and geomechanical model. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 20 (9) 1355-1373 doi:10.1139/e83-124

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleEvolution of the south-central segment of the Archean Abitibi Belt, Quebec. Part II: Tectonic evolution and geomechanical model
JournalCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences
AuthorsDimroth, ErichAuthor
Imreh, LazloAuthor
Goulet, NormandAuthor
Rocheleau, MichelAuthor
Year1983 (September 1)Volume20
Issue9
PublisherCanadian Science Publishing
DOIdoi:10.1139/e83-124Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID478010Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:478010:0
GUID0
Full ReferenceDimroth, Erich, Imreh, Lazlo, Goulet, Normand, Rocheleau, Michel (1983) Evolution of the south-central segment of the Archean Abitibi Belt, Quebec. Part II: Tectonic evolution and geomechanical model. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 20 (9) 1355-1373 doi:10.1139/e83-124
Plain TextDimroth, Erich, Imreh, Lazlo, Goulet, Normand, Rocheleau, Michel (1983) Evolution of the south-central segment of the Archean Abitibi Belt, Quebec. Part II: Tectonic evolution and geomechanical model. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 20 (9) 1355-1373 doi:10.1139/e83-124
In(1983, September) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Vol. 20 (9) Canadian Science Publishing
Abstract/Notes In this paper, we describe the relations between the paleogeographic and tectonic evolution of the southwestern part of the Archean Abitibi and Bellecombe belts. Volcanism in the Abitibi Belt created a very thick, anisotropic plate composed of competent volcanic rocks and broken by the Duparquet–Destor break. The depocenters of the upper division of diverse volcanic rocks subsided about 10 km relative to their surroundings, and some central volcanic complexes within this division were consolidated by synvolcanic plutons and their thermal metamorphic aureole. The Cadillac break, a normal fault, separated the Abitibi and Bellecombe belts. The latter consisted of comparatively incompetent sedimentary rocks on top of a basement composed of ultramafic–mafic flows.North–south compression of the volcanic terrain during the Kenoran Orogeny produced a set of flexure folds, F1, that curve around the consolidated cores of central volcanic complexes generally in an easterly direction. Synclinoria nucleated at the deeply subsident depocenters of the upper diverse division. Further north–south flattening and subvertical stretching produced the east-trending F2 folds, their axial-plane schistosity S2, and local superposed schistosities S3 and S4. Southward verging recumbent folds suggest that the Bellecombe Belt simultaneously was pulled northward below the Abitibi Belt. During the orogeny, the Duparquet–Destor and Cadillac breaks were transformed to thrust faults; the Duparquet–Destor break also shows minor (< 3 km) right-lateral strike slip. Diapiric rise of late- to post-kinematic plutons locally distorted earlier schistosities.


See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 1, 2025 17:45:46
Go to top of page