Watch the Dallas Symposium LIVE, and fundraiser auction
Ticket proceeds support mindat.org! - click here...
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Cadman, Andrew C., Heaman, Larry, Tarney, John, Wardle, Richard, Krogh, Thomas E. (1993) U–Pb geochronology and geochemical variation within two Proterozoic mafic dyke swarms, Labrador. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 30 (7) 1490-1504 doi:10.1139/e93-128

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleU–Pb geochronology and geochemical variation within two Proterozoic mafic dyke swarms, Labrador
JournalCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences
AuthorsCadman, Andrew C.Author
Heaman, LarryAuthor
Tarney, JohnAuthor
Wardle, RichardAuthor
Krogh, Thomas E.Author
Year1993 (July 1)Volume30
Issue7
PublisherCanadian Science Publishing
DOIdoi:10.1139/e93-128Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID482259Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:482259:6
GUID0
Full ReferenceCadman, Andrew C., Heaman, Larry, Tarney, John, Wardle, Richard, Krogh, Thomas E. (1993) U–Pb geochronology and geochemical variation within two Proterozoic mafic dyke swarms, Labrador. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 30 (7) 1490-1504 doi:10.1139/e93-128
Plain TextCadman, Andrew C., Heaman, Larry, Tarney, John, Wardle, Richard, Krogh, Thomas E. (1993) U–Pb geochronology and geochemical variation within two Proterozoic mafic dyke swarms, Labrador. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 30 (7) 1490-1504 doi:10.1139/e93-128
In(1993, July) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Vol. 30 (7) Canadian Science Publishing
Abstract/Notes An Early Proterozoic Kikkertavak mafic dyke intruding the Archaean Hopedale block, Labrador, gives an age of 2235 ± 2 Ma using U–Pb techniques on baddeleyite. A Harp mafic dyke in the same area gives an age of 1273 ± 1 Ma using U–Pb techniques on baddeleyite and zircon. The latter age is almost identical to that of the giant Mackenzie swarm and to the age of the BD0 dykes in South Greenland, and points to a major pulse of mafic magmatism over much of the North Atlantic craton at this time. The former age is a little older than available Rb–Sr ages for the extensive MD swarm in West Greenland, but there are possible correlatives.Geochemical data are presented to ascertain whether there are significant compositional differences between the Harp and Kikkertavak dyke swarms. In fact, two distinct chemical subgroups can be recognized within the Kikkertavak dykes, and three others are recognized within the Harp suite. These differences apply more to trace element patterns rather than major element abundances, but although there are compositional differences between the average Harp and average Kikkertavak dyke, it is unlikely that geochemistry could be used unequivocally to separate the two. The compositional differences probably reflect evolutionary processes in the lithosphere. The range of composition exemplified by the subgroups is most easily interpreted in terms of proportion of asthenosphere and lithosphere components, and does not necessarily imply that either dyke swarm was emplaced over a long period. The presence of subgroups within both swarms urges some caution in assuming all dykes correspond to one or other age.


See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: August 19, 2025 20:30:10
Go to top of page