Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Kosmochlor vs. Titanite
We're going for namesake-minerals as bright meteorite-derived green #kosmochlor is up against the wedge-shaped indicator mineral #titanite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Gaboury, Damien, Dubé, Benoît, Laflèche, Marc R., Lauzière, Kathleen (1996) Geology of the Hammer Down mesothermal gold deposit, Newfoundland Appalachians, Canada. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 33 (2) 335-350 doi:10.1139/e96-025

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleGeology of the Hammer Down mesothermal gold deposit, Newfoundland Appalachians, Canada
JournalCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences
AuthorsGaboury, DamienAuthor
Dubé, BenoîtAuthor
Laflèche, Marc R.Author
Lauzière, KathleenAuthor
Year1996 (February 1)Volume33
Issue2
PublisherCanadian Science Publishing
DOIdoi:10.1139/e96-025Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID482783Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:482783:6
GUID0
Full ReferenceGaboury, Damien, Dubé, Benoît, Laflèche, Marc R., Lauzière, Kathleen (1996) Geology of the Hammer Down mesothermal gold deposit, Newfoundland Appalachians, Canada. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 33 (2) 335-350 doi:10.1139/e96-025
Plain TextGaboury, Damien, Dubé, Benoît, Laflèche, Marc R., Lauzière, Kathleen (1996) Geology of the Hammer Down mesothermal gold deposit, Newfoundland Appalachians, Canada. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 33 (2) 335-350 doi:10.1139/e96-025
In(1996, February) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Vol. 33 (2) Canadian Science Publishing
Abstract/Notes The Hammer Down gold deposit is one of the most significant mesothermal vein-type gold deposits in the Canadian Appalachians. It is located within a complex sequence of Ordovician, mafic-dominated tholeiitic and calc-alkalic and arc-related volcanic rocks, which was intruded by Silurian felsic porphyry dykes. The host rocks have undergone complex polyphase deformation. At least three deformational events influenced vein emplacement and overall geometry of the deposit. A Taconian deformation (D1–2) was responsible for the development of a 250 m wide zone of high-strain deformation (HSZ1) at the interface between two blocks of Ordovician rocks: the Catcher's Pond Group and the Lush's Bight Group. Rocks included within the HSZ1, represent "exotic" slabs of volcanic rocks that were tectonically juxtaposed, intensively foliated (S1), and folded (F2). Gold occurs in high-grade, sulfide-rich, fault-fill quartz veins that occur within the HSZ1. At the outcrop scale, these veins are hosted by discrete centimetre- to metre-wide ductile–brittle D3 high-strain zones (HSZ3) of Silurian or younger age. The development of the gold-hosting structures (HSZ3) is genetically related to layer anisotropy induced by intrafolial F2 folds, and most importantly by the presence of felsic porphyry dykes, which were competent compared to the intensively foliated and incompetent mafic volcanic rock sequence. A postmineralization D4–5 deformation, which included two generations of folds (F4 and F5) and late brittle faulting, is responsible for the actual geometry of the deposit.


See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 21, 2025 00:24:18
Go to top of page