Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Pectolite vs. Haüyne
It's a pair of striking blue beauties as #pectolite the uncrushable faces off against #hauyne, the phoenix from volcanic ashes!
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Southwick, D. L., Chandler, Val W. (1996) Block and shear-zone architecture of the Minnesota River Valley subprovince: implications for late Archean accretionary tectonics. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 33 (6) 831-847 doi:10.1139/e96-063

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleBlock and shear-zone architecture of the Minnesota River Valley subprovince: implications for late Archean accretionary tectonics
JournalCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences
AuthorsSouthwick, D. L.Author
Chandler, Val W.Author
Year1996 (June 1)Volume33
Issue6
PublisherCanadian Science Publishing
DOIdoi:10.1139/e96-063Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID482824Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:482824:6
GUID0
Full ReferenceSouthwick, D. L., Chandler, Val W. (1996) Block and shear-zone architecture of the Minnesota River Valley subprovince: implications for late Archean accretionary tectonics. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 33 (6) 831-847 doi:10.1139/e96-063
Plain TextSouthwick, D. L., Chandler, Val W. (1996) Block and shear-zone architecture of the Minnesota River Valley subprovince: implications for late Archean accretionary tectonics. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 33 (6) 831-847 doi:10.1139/e96-063
In(1996, June) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Vol. 33 (6) Canadian Science Publishing
Abstract/Notes The Minnesota River Valley subprovince of the Superior Province is an Archean gneiss terrane composed internally of four crustal blocks bounded by three zones of east-northeast-trending linear geophysical anomalies. Two of the block-bounding zones are verified regional-scale shears. The geological nature of the third boundary has not been established. Potential-field geophysical models portray the boundary zones as moderately north-dipping surfaces or thin slabs similar in strike and dip to the Morris fault segment of the Great Lakes tectonic zone at the north margin of the subprovince. The central two blocks of the subprovince (Morton and Montevideo) are predominantly high-grade quartzofeldspathic gneiss, some as old as 3.6 Ga, and late-tectonic granite. The northern and southern blocks (Benson and Jeffers, respectively) are judged to contain less gneiss than the central blocks and a larger diversity of syntectonic and late-tectonic plutons. A belt of moderately metamorphosed mafic and ultramafic rocks having some attributes of a dismembered ophiolite is partly within the boundary zone between the Morton and Montevideo blocks. This and the other block boundaries are interpreted as late Archean structures that were reactivated in the Early Proterozoic. The Minnesota River Valley subprovince is interpreted as a late accretionary addition to the Superior Province. Because it was continental crust, it was not subductible when it impinged on the convergent southern margin of the Superior Craton in late Archean time, and it may have accommodated to convergent-margin stresses by dividing into blocks and shear zones capable of independent movement.


See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 17, 2025 10:08:48
Go to top of page