Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Sanidine vs. Hematite
It's a pair of often-overlooked classics as potassium feldspar sanidine competes with iron ore hematite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Lowe, C, Dehler, S A, Zelt, B C (2003) Basin architecture and density structure beneath the Strait of Georgia, British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 40 (7) 965-981 doi:10.1139/e03-030

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleBasin architecture and density structure beneath the Strait of Georgia, British Columbia
JournalCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences
AuthorsLowe, CAuthor
Dehler, S AAuthor
Zelt, B CAuthor
Year2003 (July 1)Volume40
Issue7
PublisherCanadian Science Publishing
DOIdoi:10.1139/e03-030Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID483834Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:483834:4
GUID0
Full ReferenceLowe, C, Dehler, S A, Zelt, B C (2003) Basin architecture and density structure beneath the Strait of Georgia, British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 40 (7) 965-981 doi:10.1139/e03-030
Plain TextLowe, C, Dehler, S A, Zelt, B C (2003) Basin architecture and density structure beneath the Strait of Georgia, British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 40 (7) 965-981 doi:10.1139/e03-030
In(2003, July) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Vol. 40 (7) Canadian Science Publishing
Abstract/Notes Georgia Basin is located within one of the most seismically active and populated areas on Canada's west coast. Over the last decade, geological investigations have resolved important details concerning the basin's shallow structure and composition. Yet, until recently, relatively little was known about deeper portions of the basin. In this study, new seismic velocity information is employed to develop a 3-dimensional density model of the basin. Comparison of the calculated gravity response of this model with the observed gravity field validates the velocity model at large scales. At smaller scales, several differences between model and observed gravity fields are recognized. Analysis of these differences and correlation with independent geoscience data provide new insights into the structure and composition of the basin-fill and underlying basement. Specifically, four regions with thick accumulations of unconsolidated Pleistocene and younger sediments, which were not resolved in the velocity model, are identified. Their delineation is particularly important for studies of seismic ground-motion amplification and offshore aggregate assessment. An inconsistency between the published geology and the seismic structure beneath Texada and Lasqueti Islands in the central Strait of Georgia is investigated; however, the available gravity data cannot preferentially validate either the geologic interpretation or the seismic model in this region. We interpret a northwest-trending and relatively linear gradient extending from Savory Island in the north to Boundary Bay in the south as the eastern margin of Wrangellia beneath the basin. Finally, we compare Georgia Basin with the Everett and Seattle basins in the southern Cascadia fore arc. This comparison indicates that while a single mechanism may be controlling present-day basin tectonics and deformation within the fore arc this was not the case for most of the Mesozoic and Tertiary time periods.


See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 7, 2025 11:59:03
Go to top of page