Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Stibnite vs. Perovskite
It's all about how minerals interact with humans as dramatic #stibnite faces off against futuristic #perovskite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Pigage, L.C., Crowley, J.L., Pyle, L.J., Abbott, J.G., Roots, C.F., Schmitz, M.D. (2012) U–Pb zircon age of an Ordovician tuff in southeast Yukon: implications for the age of the Cambrian–Ordovician boundary1Yukon Geological Survey Contribution 013.2Geological Survey of Canada Earth Science Sector (ESS) Contribution 20110362. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 49 (6) 732-741 doi:10.1139/e2012-017

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleU–Pb zircon age of an Ordovician tuff in southeast Yukon: implications for the age of the Cambrian–Ordovician boundary1Yukon Geological Survey Contribution 013.2Geological Survey of Canada Earth Science Sector (ESS) Contribution 20110362.
JournalCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences
AuthorsPigage, L.C.Author
Crowley, J.L.Author
Pyle, L.J.Author
Abbott, J.G.Author
Roots, C.F.Author
Schmitz, M.D.Author
Year2012 (June)Volume49
Issue6
PublisherCanadian Science Publishing
DOIdoi:10.1139/e2012-017Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID484833Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:484833:6
GUID0
Full ReferencePigage, L.C., Crowley, J.L., Pyle, L.J., Abbott, J.G., Roots, C.F., Schmitz, M.D. (2012) U–Pb zircon age of an Ordovician tuff in southeast Yukon: implications for the age of the Cambrian–Ordovician boundary1Yukon Geological Survey Contribution 013.2Geological Survey of Canada Earth Science Sector (ESS) Contribution 20110362. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 49 (6) 732-741 doi:10.1139/e2012-017
Plain TextPigage, L.C., Crowley, J.L., Pyle, L.J., Abbott, J.G., Roots, C.F., Schmitz, M.D. (2012) U–Pb zircon age of an Ordovician tuff in southeast Yukon: implications for the age of the Cambrian–Ordovician boundary1Yukon Geological Survey Contribution 013.2Geological Survey of Canada Earth Science Sector (ESS) Contribution 20110362. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 49 (6) 732-741 doi:10.1139/e2012-017
In(2012, June) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Vol. 49 (6) Canadian Science Publishing
Abstract/Notes Three conodont fossil occurrences stratigraphically above and below a rhyolitic tuff in the Lower Ordovician Crow Formation, southeast Yukon, constrain the tuff to the early Tremadocian Rossodus manitouensis Zone and possibly the Rossodus tenuis Zone. U–Pb dates were obtained from zircon from the tuff that was imaged with cathodoluminescence and chemically abraded to reduce the likelihood of dating grains that contain older components or suffered Pb loss, respectively. Six dates from grains with oscillatory parallel zoning are equivalent, with a weighted mean 206Pb/238U date of 491.04 ± 0.13 Ma. These grains are interpreted as being primary volcanic crystals, and the date is therefore taken as the depositional age of the tuff. Four other dates from grains with sector zoning are slightly older, up to 492.0 Ma, and are interpreted as inherited or recycled from earlier volcanics. The currently defined Cambrian–Ordovician boundary is inferred to be below the tuff and separated from it by at least two conodont biostratigraphic zones that are estimated to span at least 2.25 Ma based on the top of the Rhabdinopora flabelliformis parabola graptolite zone being older than the base of the Rossodus tenuis conodont zone. We interpret the evidence in southeast Yukon to suggest that the global Cambrian–Ordovician boundary is older (>493.3 Ma) than previous estimates of ∼488 and 491 Ma based upon legacy 207Pb/206Pb zircon ages.


See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 18, 2025 02:37:10
Go to top of page