Newton, David E., Kopylova, Maya G., Burgess, Jennifer, Strand, Pamela (2016) Peridotite and pyroxenite xenoliths from the Muskox kimberlite, northern Slave craton, Canada. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 53 (1) 41-58 doi:10.1139/cjes-2015-0083
| Reference Type | Journal (article/letter/editorial) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Title | Peridotite and pyroxenite xenoliths from the Muskox kimberlite, northern Slave craton, Canada | ||
| Journal | Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences | ||
| Authors | Newton, David E. | Author | |
| Kopylova, Maya G. | Author | ||
| Burgess, Jennifer | Author | ||
| Strand, Pamela | Author | ||
| Year | 2016 (January) | Volume | 53 |
| Issue | 1 | ||
| Publisher | Canadian Science Publishing | ||
| DOI | doi:10.1139/cjes-2015-0083Search in ResearchGate | ||
| Generate Citation Formats | |||
| Mindat Ref. ID | 485175 | Long-form Identifier | mindat:1:5:485175:6 |
| GUID | 0 | ||
| Full Reference | Newton, David E., Kopylova, Maya G., Burgess, Jennifer, Strand, Pamela (2016) Peridotite and pyroxenite xenoliths from the Muskox kimberlite, northern Slave craton, Canada. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 53 (1) 41-58 doi:10.1139/cjes-2015-0083 | ||
| Plain Text | Newton, David E., Kopylova, Maya G., Burgess, Jennifer, Strand, Pamela (2016) Peridotite and pyroxenite xenoliths from the Muskox kimberlite, northern Slave craton, Canada. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 53 (1) 41-58 doi:10.1139/cjes-2015-0083 | ||
| In | (2016, January) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Vol. 53 (1) Canadian Science Publishing | ||
| Abstract/Notes | We present petrography, mineralogy, and thermobarometry for 53 mantle-derived xenoliths from the Muskox kimberlite pipe in the northern Slave craton. The xenolith suite includes 23% coarse peridotite, 9% porphyroclastic peridotite, 60% websterite, and 8% orthopyroxenite. Samples primarily comprise forsteritic olivine (Fo 89–94), enstatite (En 89–94), Cr-diopside, Cr-pyrope garnet, and chromite spinel. Coarse peridotites, porphyroclastic peridotites, and pyroxenites equilibrated at 650–1220 °C and 23–63 kbar (1 kbar = 100 MPa), 1200–1350 °C and 57–70 kbar, and 1030–1230 °C and 50–63 kbar, respectively. The Muskox xenoliths differ from xenoliths in the neighboring and contemporaneous Jericho kimberlite by their higher levels of depletion, the presence of a shallow zone of metasomatism in the spinel peridotite field, a higher proportion of pyroxenites at the base of the mantle column, higher Cr2O3 in all pyroxenite minerals, and weaker deformation in the Muskox mantle. We interpret these contrasts as representing small-scale heterogeneities in the bulk composition of the mantle, as well as the local effects of interaction between metasomatizing fluid and mantle wall rocks. We suggest that asthenosphere-derived pre-kimberlitic melts and fluids percolated less effectively through the less permeable Muskox mantle, resulting in lower degrees of hydrous weakening, strain, and fertilization of the peridotitic mantle. Fluids tended to concentrate and pool in the deep mantle, causing partial melting and formation of abundant pyroxenites. | ||
See Also
These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.
