Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Chrysotile vs. Pectolite
Two new minerals to launch this year's cup! Hazardous (but useful!) chrysotile faces off against stunning gem pectolite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Gopalan, K., Kumar, Anil (2008) Phlogopite K–Ca dating of Narayanpet kimberlites, south India: Implications to the discordance between their Rb–Sr and Ar/Ar ages. Precambrian Research, 167 (3) 377-382 doi:10.1016/j.precamres.2008.09.006

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitlePhlogopite K–Ca dating of Narayanpet kimberlites, south India: Implications to the discordance between their Rb–Sr and Ar/Ar ages
JournalPrecambrian Research
AuthorsGopalan, K.Author
Kumar, AnilAuthor
Year2008 (December)Volume167
Issue3
PublisherElsevier BV
URL
DOIdoi:10.1016/j.precamres.2008.09.006Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID705658Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:705658:5
GUID0
Full ReferenceGopalan, K., Kumar, Anil (2008) Phlogopite K–Ca dating of Narayanpet kimberlites, south India: Implications to the discordance between their Rb–Sr and Ar/Ar ages. Precambrian Research, 167 (3) 377-382 doi:10.1016/j.precamres.2008.09.006
Plain TextGopalan, K., Kumar, Anil (2008) Phlogopite K–Ca dating of Narayanpet kimberlites, south India: Implications to the discordance between their Rb–Sr and Ar/Ar ages. Precambrian Research, 167 (3) 377-382 doi:10.1016/j.precamres.2008.09.006
In(2008, December) Precambrian Research Vol. 167 (3) Elsevier BV

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

Kumar, Anil, Padma Kumari, V.M., Dayal, A.M., Murthy, D.S.N., Gopalan, K. (1993) RbSr ages of Proterozoic kimberlites of India: evidence for contemporaneous emplacement. Precambrian Research, 62 (3) 227-237 doi:10.1016/0301-9268(93)90023-u
Kumar, A., Gopalan, K., Rao, K.R.P. & Nayak, S.S. (2001). Rb-Sr ages of kimberlites and lamproites from Eastern Dharwar craton, South India. J. Geol. Soc. India, 58, 135-142.
Clauer, Norbert (1981) Rb—Sr and K—Ar dating of Precambrian clays and glauconies. Precambrian Research, 15 (3) 331-352 doi:10.1016/0301-9268(81)90056-5
Venkatasubramanian, V. S., Gopalan, K., Iyer, S. S., Pal, S., Krishnan, R. S. (1968) Studies on the Rb–Sr and K–Ar dating of minerals from the Precambrian of India. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 5 (3) 601-603 doi:10.1139/e68-055
Kumar, Anil, Heaman, Larry M., Manikyamba, C. (2008) Corrigendum to: “Mesoproterozoic Kimberlites in south India: A possible link to ∼1.1 Ga global magmatism” [Precambrian Res. 154 (2007) 192–204]. Precambrian Research, 161 (3) 475 doi:10.1016/j.precamres.2007.10.007
Kumar, Anil, Rao, Y.J.Bhaskar, Sivaraman, T.V., Gopalan, K. (1996) SmNd ages of Archaean metavolcanics of the Dharwar craton, South India. Precambrian Research, 80 (3) 205-216 doi:10.1016/s0301-9268(96)00015-0
Kumar, Anil, Heaman, Larry M., Manikyamba, C. (2007) Mesoproterozoic kimberlites in south India: A possible link to ∼1.1Ga global magmatism. Precambrian Research, 154 (3) 192-204 doi:10.1016/j.precamres.2006.12.007
Kumar, A., Gopalan, K., Rao, K.R.P. & Nayak, S.S. 2001. Rb-Sr age of kimberlites and lamproites from eastern Dharwar Craton, south India. Journal of the Geological Society of India, 58, 135-141.
Osborne, Ian, Sherlock, Sarah, Anand, Mahesh, Argles, Tom (2011) New Ar–Ar ages of southern Indian kimberlites and a lamproite and their geochemical evolution. Precambrian Research, 189 (1) 91-103 doi:10.1016/j.precamres.2011.05.004
Gopalan, K. (2008) Conjunctive K–Ca and Rb–Sr dating of glauconies. Chemical Geology, 247 (1) 119-123 doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2007.10.004
Phillips, David (2012) Comment on “New Ar–Ar ages of southern Indian kimberlites and a lamproite and their geochemical evolution” by Osborne et al. [Precambrian Res. 189 (2011) 91–103]. Precambrian Research, 208. 49-52 doi:10.1016/j.precamres.2012.03.012
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 1, 2025 12:37:23
Go to top of page