Hey, Max H. (1930) On face- and zone-symbols referred to hexagonal axes. Mineralogical Magazine and Journal of the Mineralogical Society, 22 (129) 283-290 doi:10.1180/minmag.1930.022.129.04

Reference Type | Journal (article/letter/editorial) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Title | On face- and zone-symbols referred to hexagonal axes | ||
Journal | Mineralogical Magazine and Journal of the Mineralogical Society | ||
Authors | Hey, Max H. | Author | |
Year | 1930 (June) | Volume | 22 |
Issue | 129 | ||
Publisher | Mineralogical Society | ||
Download URL | https://rruff.info/doclib/MinMag/Volume_22/22-129-283.pdf+ | ||
DOI | doi:10.1180/minmag.1930.022.129.04 | ||
Generate Citation Formats | |||
Mindat Ref. ID | 7098 | Long-form Identifier | mindat:1:5:7098:4 |
GUID | 0 | ||
Full Reference | Hey, Max H. (1930) On face- and zone-symbols referred to hexagonal axes. Mineralogical Magazine and Journal of the Mineralogical Society, 22 (129) 283-290 doi:10.1180/minmag.1930.022.129.04 | ||
Plain Text | Hey, Max H. (1930) On face- and zone-symbols referred to hexagonal axes. Mineralogical Magazine and Journal of the Mineralogical Society, 22 (129) 283-290 doi:10.1180/minmag.1930.022.129.04 | ||
In | (1929) Mineralogical Magazine Vol. 22 (129) Mineralogical Society | ||
Abstract/Notes | The axial system of Bravais, with three co-planar axes at 120°C to one another and a fourth at right angles to them is almost universally adopted for the description of crystals based on the hexagonal prism as unit cell. But it does not seem to have been generally recognized that the use of these axes entails some complications in respect of face- and zone-symbols. These it is the purpose of the present note to consider. |
See Also
These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() | |
![]() |