Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Stibnite vs. Okenite
It's a battle of dark and light as soft, dramatic stibnite goes up against adorable cottonballs of Okenite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Scherbaum, F. (2005) Composite Ground-Motion Models and Logic Trees: Methodology, Sensitivities, and Uncertainties. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 95 (5). 1575-1593 doi:10.1785/0120040229

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleComposite Ground-Motion Models and Logic Trees: Methodology, Sensitivities, and Uncertainties
JournalBulletin of the Seismological Society of America
AuthorsScherbaum, F.Author
Year2005 (October 1)Volume95
Issue5
PublisherSeismological Society of America (SSA)
DOIdoi:10.1785/0120040229Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID7197835Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:7197835:2
GUID0
Full ReferenceScherbaum, F. (2005) Composite Ground-Motion Models and Logic Trees: Methodology, Sensitivities, and Uncertainties. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 95 (5). 1575-1593 doi:10.1785/0120040229
Plain TextScherbaum, F. (2005) Composite Ground-Motion Models and Logic Trees: Methodology, Sensitivities, and Uncertainties. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 95 (5). 1575-1593 doi:10.1785/0120040229
In(2005, October) Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Vol. 95 (5) Seismological Society of America (SSA)

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

Bommer, J. J. (2005) On the Use of Logic Trees for Ground-Motion Prediction Equations in Seismic-Hazard Analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 95 (2). 377-389 doi:10.1785/0120040073
Scherbaum, F. (2006) The Estimation of Minimum-Misfit Stochastic Models from Empirical Ground-Motion Prediction Equations. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 96 (2). 427-445 doi:10.1785/0120050015
Beauval, C. (2004) Quantifying Sensitivities of PSHA for France to Earthquake Catalog Uncertainties, Truncation of Ground-Motion Variability, and Magnitude Limits. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 94 (5). 1579-1594 doi:10.1785/012003246
Kuehn, N. M., Scherbaum, F., Riggelsen, C. (2009) Deriving Empirical Ground-Motion Models: Balancing Data Constraints and Physical Assumptions to Optimize Prediction Capability. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 99 (4). 2335-2347 doi:10.1785/0120080136
Cotton, F., Pousse, G., Bonilla, F., Scherbaum, F. (2008) On the Discrepancy of Recent European Ground-Motion Observations and Predictions from Empirical Models: Analysis of KiK-net Accelerometric Data and Point-Sources Stochastic Simulations. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 98 (5). 2244-2261 doi:10.1785/0120060084
Bazzurro, P. (2005) Ground-Motion Amplification in Nonlinear Soil Sites with Uncertain Properties. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 95 (5). 2027 doi:10.1785/0120050186
Tavakoli, B. (2005) Empirical-Stochastic Ground-Motion Prediction for Eastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 95 (6). 2283-2296 doi:10.1785/0120050030
Scognamiglio, L. (2005) Ground-Motion Scaling in Eastern Sicily, Italy. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 95 (2). 568-578 doi:10.1785/0120030124
Scherbaum, F. (2004) On the Use of Response Spectral-Reference Data for the Selection and Ranking of Ground-Motion Models for Seismic-Hazard Analysis in Regions of Moderate Seismicity: The Case of Rock Motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 94 (6). 2164-2185 doi:10.1785/0120030147
Kuehn, N. M., Riggelsen, C., Scherbaum, F. (2011) Modeling the Joint Probability of Earthquake, Site, and Ground-Motion Parameters Using Bayesian Networks. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 101 (1). 235-249 doi:10.1785/0120100080
Asano, K. (2005) Estimation of Source Rupture Process and Strong Ground Motion Simulation of the 2002 Denali, Alaska, Earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 95 (5). 1701-1715 doi:10.1785/0120040154
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are Β© OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 2, 2025 10:54:20
Go to top of page