Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Kosmochlor vs. Azurite
It's a battle of green vs blue as rare but vibrant chromium-bearing kosmochlor up against the deep blue copper alteration mineral azurite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Conn, Michael, Parker, James (2008) Winners and Losers in the Animal Research Wars. American Scientist, 96 (3). 184pp. doi:10.1511/2008.71.184

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleWinners and Losers in the Animal Research Wars
JournalAmerican Scientist
AuthorsConn, MichaelAuthor
Parker, JamesAuthor
Year2008Volume96
Issue3
PublisherSigma Xi
DOIdoi:10.1511/2008.71.184Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID7363014Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:7363014:6
GUID0
Full ReferenceConn, Michael, Parker, James (2008) Winners and Losers in the Animal Research Wars. American Scientist, 96 (3). 184pp. doi:10.1511/2008.71.184
Plain TextConn, Michael, Parker, James (2008) Winners and Losers in the Animal Research Wars. American Scientist, 96 (3). 184pp. doi:10.1511/2008.71.184
In(2008) American Scientist Vol. 96 (3) Sigma Xi

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

Blum, Deborah (2008) Review: The Animal Research War by P. Michael Conn and James V. Parker. New Scientist, 198 (2659) 48 doi:10.1016/s0262-4079(08)61436-0
Porter, James (2008) What Makes Science, Science. American Scientist, 96 (3). 178pp. doi:10.1511/2008.71.178
Bell, Michael (2008) Variations on a Theme. American Scientist, 96 (3). 257pp. doi:10.1511/2008.71.257
(2008) In the News. American Scientist, 96 (3). 209pp. doi:10.1511/2008.71.209
Lynch, Michael (2008) Know-How. American Scientist, 96 (4). 337pp. doi:10.1511/2008.73.3824
Branch, Michael (2008) John O'Mountains. American Scientist, 96 (6). 504pp. doi:10.1511/2008.75.504
Corballis, Michael (2008) Not the Last Word. American Scientist, 96 (1). 68pp. doi:10.1511/2008.69.68
Ruse, Michael (2008) Handmaiden to the Science?. American Scientist, 96 (4). 340pp. doi:10.1511/2008.73.3807
Kossin, James (2008) A Scientific Tempest. American Scientist, 96 (1). 78pp. doi:10.1511/2008.69.78
(2008) Table the Discussion. American Scientist, 96 (3). 179pp. doi:10.1511/2008.71.3605
Timblin, Dianne (2018) Cool Customers. American Scientist, 106 (3). 184pp. doi:10.1511/2018.106.3.184
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are Β© OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 9, 2025 20:53:34
Go to top of page