Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Sanidine vs. Hematite
It's a pair of often-overlooked classics as potassium feldspar sanidine competes with iron ore hematite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Meyer, Peter, Vogt, Rochus (1961) The primary cosmic-ray electron flux during a Forbush-type decrease. Journal of Geophysical Research, 66 (11) 3950-3952 doi:10.1029/jz066i011p03950

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleThe primary cosmic-ray electron flux during a Forbush-type decrease
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research
AuthorsMeyer, PeterAuthor
Vogt, RochusAuthor
Year1961 (November)Volume66
Issue11
PublisherAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)
DOIdoi:10.1029/jz066i011p03950Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID760836Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:760836:4
GUID0
Full ReferenceMeyer, Peter, Vogt, Rochus (1961) The primary cosmic-ray electron flux during a Forbush-type decrease. Journal of Geophysical Research, 66 (11) 3950-3952 doi:10.1029/jz066i011p03950
Plain TextMeyer, Peter, Vogt, Rochus (1961) The primary cosmic-ray electron flux during a Forbush-type decrease. Journal of Geophysical Research, 66 (11) 3950-3952 doi:10.1029/jz066i011p03950
In(1961, November) Journal of Geophysical Research Vol. 66 (11) American Geophysical Union (AGU)

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

Meyer, Peter (1960) The cosmic ray alpha-particle flux during sharp Forbush intensity decreases. Journal of Geophysical Research, 65 (12) 3881-3887 doi:10.1029/jz065i012p03881
Biswas, S. (1961) Forbush decrease of the flux of heavy primary nuclei of cosmic rays on May 12 and July 12, 1959. Journal of Geophysical Research, 66 (9) 2653-2657 doi:10.1029/jz066i009p02653
Meyer, Peter, Vogt, Rochus (1961) Electrons in the Primary Cosmic Radiation. Physical Review Letters, 6 (4). 193-196 doi:10.1103/physrevlett.6.193
L'Heureux, Jacques, Meyer, Peter, Verma, Satya Dev, Vogt, Rochus (1968) Long-term variations of the primary cosmic-ray electron component. Canadian Journal of Physics, 46. doi:10.1139/p68-377
Bland, C. J. (1976) A simple model for the forbush decrease in the galactic cosmic ray flux. Journal of Geophysical Research, 81 (10) 1807-1811 doi:10.1029/ja081i010p01807
Meyer, Peter, Vogt, Rochus (1963) Primary Cosmic Ray and Solar Protons. II. Physical Review, 129 (5). 2275-2279 doi:10.1103/physrev.129.2275
Nishida, Atsuhiro (1983) Numerical modeling of the energy spectrum of the cosmic ray Forbush Decrease. Journal of Geophysical Research, 88. 785 doi:10.1029/ja088ia02p00785
Lockwood, J. A., Razdan, H. (1963) Asymmetries in the Forbush decreases of the cosmic radiation: 2. Superimposed intensity variations during a Forbush decrease. Journal of Geophysical Research, 68 (6) 1593-1604 doi:10.1029/jz068i006p01593
McDonald, F. B., Webber, W. R. (1960) Changes in the low-rigidity primary cosmic radiation during the large Forbush decrease of May 12, 1959. Journal of Geophysical Research, 65 (2) 767-770 doi:10.1029/jz065i002p00767
Hofer, M. Y., Flückiger, E. O. (2000) Cosmic ray spectral variations and anisotropy near Earth during the March 24, 1991, Forbush decrease. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 105. 23085-23097 doi:10.1029/1999ja900472
Van Allen, J. A. (1979) Propagation of a Forbush decrease in cosmic ray intensity to 15.9 AU. Geophysical Research Letters, 6 (7) 566-568 doi:10.1029/gl006i007p00566
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 7, 2025 13:47:55
Go to top of page