Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Taenite vs. Nontronite
It's a mineral found mostly in the farthest reaches of space vs one so common an exhaustive list of localities is nigh impossible as alloy #taenite faces off against clay #nontronite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Olszyna, Kenneth J., Bairai, Solomon T., Tanner, Roger L. (2005) Effect of ambient NH3 levels on PM2.5 composition in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Atmospheric Environment, 39 (25). 4593-4606 doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.011

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleEffect of ambient NH3 levels on PM2.5 composition in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park
JournalAtmospheric Environment
AuthorsOlszyna, Kenneth J.Author
Bairai, Solomon T.Author
Tanner, Roger L.Author
Year2005 (August)Volume39
Issue25
PublisherElsevier BV
DOIdoi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.011Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID9606077Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:9606077:1
GUID0
Full ReferenceOlszyna, Kenneth J., Bairai, Solomon T., Tanner, Roger L. (2005) Effect of ambient NH3 levels on PM2.5 composition in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Atmospheric Environment, 39 (25). 4593-4606 doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.011
Plain TextOlszyna, Kenneth J., Bairai, Solomon T., Tanner, Roger L. (2005) Effect of ambient NH3 levels on PM2.5 composition in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Atmospheric Environment, 39 (25). 4593-4606 doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.011
In(2005, August) Atmospheric Environment Vol. 39 (25) Elsevier BV

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

Tanner, Roger L., Bairai, Solomon T., Olszyna, Kenneth J., Valente, Myra L., Valente, Ralph J. (2005) Diurnal patterns in PM2.5 mass and composition at a background, complex terrain site. Atmospheric Environment, 39 (21). 3865-3875 doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.03.014
Valente, Ralph J., Shea, Catherine, Lynn Humes, K., Tanner, Roger L. (2007) Atmospheric mercury in the Great Smoky Mountains compared to regional and global levels. Atmospheric Environment, 41 (9). 1861-1873 doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.054
Luria, Menachem, Valente, Ralph J., Bairai, Solomon, Parkhurst, William J., Tanner, Roger L. (2008) Nighttime chemistry in the Houston urban plume. Atmospheric Environment, 42 (32). 7544-7552 doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.04.054
Luria, Menachem, Valente, Ralph J., Bairai, Solomon, Parkhurst, William J., Tanner, Roger L. (2008) Airborne study of ozone formation over Dallas, Texas. Atmospheric Environment, 42 (29). 6951-6958 doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.04.057
Cheng, Meng-Dawn, Tanner, Roger L. (2002) Characterization of ultrafine and fine particles at a site near the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Atmospheric Environment, 36 (38). 5795-5806 doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(02)00625-8
Tanner, Roger L., Olszyna, Kenneth J., Edgerton, Eric S., Knipping, Eladio, Shaw, Stephanie L. (2009) Searching for evidence of acid-catalyzed enhancement of secondary organic aerosol formation using ambient aerosol data. Atmospheric Environment, 43 (21). 3440-3444 doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.03.045
Fisher, L. Suzanne, Wolfe, Mark H. (2012) Examination of mercury inputs by throughfall and litterfall in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Atmospheric Environment, 47. 554-559 doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.017
(2012) Ambient ozone effects on gas exchange and total non-structural carbohydrate levels in cutleaf coneflower (Rudbeckia laciniata L.) growing in Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Environmental Pollution, 160. 74-81 doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2011.09.010
YU, L, SHULMAN, M, KOPPERUD, R, HILDEMANN, L (2005) Fine organic aerosols collected in a humid, rural location (Great Smoky Mountains, Tennessee, USA): Chemical and temporal characteristics. Atmospheric Environment, 39 (33). 6037-6050 doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.06.043
Tanner, Roger L., Parkhurst, William J., Valente, Myra L., David Phillips, W. (2004) Regional composition of PM2.5 aerosols measured at urban, rural and “background” sites in the Tennessee valley. Atmospheric Environment, 38 (20). 3143-3153 doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.03.023
Luria, M., Tanner, R.L., Valente, R.J., Bairai, S.T., Koracin, D., Gertler, A.W. (2005) Local and transported pollution over San Diego, California. Atmospheric Environment, 39 (36). 6765-6776 doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.07.051
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 15, 2025 17:53:18
Go to top of page