Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Kosmochlor vs. Azurite
It's a battle of green vs blue as rare but vibrant chromium-bearing kosmochlor up against the deep blue copper alteration mineral azurite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Eker, Sibel, Kwakkel, Jan H. (2018) Including robustness considerations in the search phase of Many-Objective Robust Decision Making. Environmental Modelling & Software, 105. 201-216 doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.03.029

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleIncluding robustness considerations in the search phase of Many-Objective Robust Decision Making
JournalEnvironmental Modelling & Software
AuthorsEker, SibelAuthor
Kwakkel, Jan H.Author
Year2018 (July)Volume105
PublisherElsevier BV
DOIdoi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.03.029Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID9715121Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:9715121:0
GUID0
Full ReferenceEker, Sibel, Kwakkel, Jan H. (2018) Including robustness considerations in the search phase of Many-Objective Robust Decision Making. Environmental Modelling & Software, 105. 201-216 doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.03.029
Plain TextEker, Sibel, Kwakkel, Jan H. (2018) Including robustness considerations in the search phase of Many-Objective Robust Decision Making. Environmental Modelling & Software, 105. 201-216 doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.03.029
In(n.d.) Environmental Modelling & Software Vol. 105. Elsevier BV

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

Bartholomew, Erin, Kwakkel, Jan H. (2020) On considering robustness in the search phase of Robust Decision Making: A comparison of Many-Objective Robust Decision Making, multi-scenario Many-Objective Robust Decision Making, and Many Objective Robust Optimization. Environmental Modelling & Software, 127. 104699pp. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104699
Kwakkel, Jan H. (2017) The Exploratory Modeling Workbench: An open source toolkit for exploratory modeling, scenario discovery, and (multi-objective) robust decision making. Environmental Modelling & Software, 96. 239-250 doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.054
Shavazipour, Babooshka, Kwakkel, Jan H., Miettinen, Kaisa (2025) Let decision-makers direct the search for robust solutions: An interactive framework for multiobjective robust optimization under deep uncertainty. Environmental Modelling & Software, 183. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106233
Kwakkel, Jan H., Haasnoot, Marjolijn, Walker, Warren E. (2016) Comparing Robust Decision-Making and Dynamic Adaptive Policy Pathways for model-based decision support under deep uncertainty. Environmental Modelling & Software, 86. 168-183 doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.09.017
Ciullo, A., Domeneghetti, A., Kwakkel, J.H., De Bruijn, K.M., Klijn, F., Castellarin, A. (2023) Belief-Informed Robust Decision Making (BIRDM): Assessing changes in decision robustness due to changing distributions of deep uncertainties. Environmental Modelling & Software, 159. 105560 doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105560
Shavazipour, Babooshka, Kwakkel, Jan H., Miettinen, Kaisa (2021) Multi-scenario multi-objective robust optimization under deep uncertainty: A posteriori approach. Environmental Modelling & Software, 144. 105134pp. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105134
Hadka, David, Herman, Jonathan, Reed, Patrick, Keller, Klaus (2015) An open source framework for many-objective robust decision making. Environmental Modelling & Software, 74. 114-129 doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.07.014
Kasprzyk, Joseph R., Nataraj, Shanthi, Reed, Patrick M., Lempert, Robert J. (2013) Many objective robust decision making for complex environmental systems undergoing change. Environmental Modelling & Software, 42. 55-71 doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.12.007
Eker, Sibel, Rovenskaya, Elena, Langan, Simon, Obersteiner, Michael (2019) Model validation: A bibliometric analysis of the literature. Environmental Modelling & Software, 117. 43-54 doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.03.009
Watson, Abigail A., Kasprzyk, Joseph R. (2017) Incorporating deeply uncertain factors into the many objective search process. Environmental Modelling & Software, 89. 159-171 doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.12.001
Zatarain Salazar, Jazmin, Kwakkel, Jan H., Witvliet, Mark (2024) Evaluating the choice of radial basis functions in multiobjective optimal control applications. Environmental Modelling & Software, 171. 105889 doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105889
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are Β© OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 9, 2025 16:01:30
Go to top of page