Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Baryte vs. Hematite
It's a heavyweight match between industrial powerhouses as soft #baryte competes against rusty red #hematite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Mora, Esteve Borràs, Spelling, James, van der Weijde, Adriaan H. (2019) Benchmarking the PAWN distribution-based method against the variance-based method in global sensitivity analysis: Empirical results. Environmental Modelling & Software, 122. 104556pp. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104556

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleBenchmarking the PAWN distribution-based method against the variance-based method in global sensitivity analysis: Empirical results
JournalEnvironmental Modelling & Software
AuthorsMora, Esteve BorràsAuthor
Spelling, JamesAuthor
van der Weijde, Adriaan H.Author
Year2019 (December)Volume122
PublisherElsevier BV
DOIdoi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104556Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID9715512Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:9715512:8
GUID0
Full ReferenceMora, Esteve Borràs, Spelling, James, van der Weijde, Adriaan H. (2019) Benchmarking the PAWN distribution-based method against the variance-based method in global sensitivity analysis: Empirical results. Environmental Modelling & Software, 122. 104556pp. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104556
Plain TextMora, Esteve Borràs, Spelling, James, van der Weijde, Adriaan H. (2019) Benchmarking the PAWN distribution-based method against the variance-based method in global sensitivity analysis: Empirical results. Environmental Modelling & Software, 122. 104556pp. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104556
In(n.d.) Environmental Modelling & Software Vol. 122. Elsevier BV

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

Mora, Esteve Borràs, Spelling, James, van der Weijde, Adriaan H. (2019) How does risk aversion shape overplanting in the design of offshore wind farms?. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1356. 12026pp. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1356/1/012026
Sun, Xifu, Croke, Barry, Jakeman, Anthony, Roberts, Stephen (2022) Benchmarking Active Subspace methods of global sensitivity analysis against variance-based Sobol' and Morris methods with established test functions. Environmental Modelling & Software, 149. 105310pp. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105310
Baroni, Gabriele, Francke, Till (2020) An effective strategy for combining variance- and distribution-based global sensitivity analysis. Environmental Modelling & Software, 134. 104851pp. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104851
Pianosi, Francesca, Wagener, Thorsten (2015) A simple and efficient method for global sensitivity analysis based on cumulative distribution functions. Environmental Modelling & Software, 67. 1-11 doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.01.004
Puy, Arnald, Lo Piano, Samuele, Saltelli, Andrea (2020) A sensitivity analysis of the PAWN sensitivity index. Environmental Modelling & Software, 127. 104679pp. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104679
Kloprogge, Penny, van der Sluijs, Jeroen P., Petersen, Arthur C. (2011) A method for the analysis of assumptions in model-based environmental assessments. Environmental Modelling & Software, 26 (3). 289-301 doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.06.009
Plischke, Elmar (2012) How to compute variance-based sensitivity indicators with your spreadsheet software. Environmental Modelling & Software, 35. 188-191 doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.03.004
Shahsavani, D., Grimvall, A. (2011) Variance-based sensitivity analysis of model outputs using surrogate models. Environmental Modelling & Software, 26 (6). 723-730 doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.01.002
Khorashadi Zadeh, Farkhondeh, Nossent, Jiri, Sarrazin, Fanny, Pianosi, Francesca, van Griensven, Ann, Wagener, Thorsten, Bauwens, Willy (2017) Comparison of variance-based and moment-independent global sensitivity analysis approaches by application to the SWAT model. Environmental Modelling & Software, 91. 210-222 doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.02.001
Estrada, V., Diaz, M.S. (2010) Global sensitivity analysis in the development of first principle-based eutrophication models. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25 (12). 1539-1551 doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.06.009
Wang, Jing, Li, Xin, Lu, Ling, Fang, Feng (2013) Parameter sensitivity analysis of crop growth models based on the extended Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test method. Environmental Modelling & Software, 48. 171-182 doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.06.007
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 19, 2025 16:37:17
Go to top of page