Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Calcite vs. Perovskite
This match of heavy hitters is bound to end in heartbreak as classic calcite faces off against futuristic perovskite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Dasgupta, Shiv N. (2005) When 4D seismic is not applicable: Alternative monitoring scenarios for the Arab-D reservoir in the Ghawar Field. Geophysical Prospecting, 53 (2) 215-227 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00473.x

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleWhen 4D seismic is not applicable: Alternative monitoring scenarios for the Arab-D reservoir in the Ghawar Field
JournalGeophysical Prospecting
AuthorsDasgupta, Shiv N.Author
Year2005 (March)Volume53
Issue2
PublisherWiley
DOIdoi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00473.xSearch in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID990585Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:990585:0
GUID0
Full ReferenceDasgupta, Shiv N. (2005) When 4D seismic is not applicable: Alternative monitoring scenarios for the Arab-D reservoir in the Ghawar Field. Geophysical Prospecting, 53 (2) 215-227 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00473.x
Plain TextDasgupta, Shiv N. (2005) When 4D seismic is not applicable: Alternative monitoring scenarios for the Arab-D reservoir in the Ghawar Field. Geophysical Prospecting, 53 (2) 215-227 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00473.x
In(2005, March) Geophysical Prospecting Vol. 53 (2) Wiley

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

Staples, Rob, Hague, Paul, Weisenborn, Toon, Ashton, Peter, Michalek, Barbara (2005) 4D seismic for oil-rim monitoring. Geophysical Prospecting, 53 (2) 243-251 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00468.x
MacBeth, C., Stephen, K.D., McInally, A. (2005) The 4D seismic signature of oil-water contact movement due to natural production in a stacked turbidite reservoir. Geophysical Prospecting, 53 (2) 183-203 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00463.x
Stucchi, E., Mazzotti, A., Ciuffi, S. (2005) Seismic preprocessing and amplitude cross-calibration for a time-lapse amplitude study on seismic data from the Oseberg reservoir. Geophysical Prospecting, 53 (2) 265-282 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00471.x
Huang, Yi, MacBeth, Colin (2012) Direct correlation of 4D seismic with well activity for a clarified dynamic reservoir interpretation. Geophysical Prospecting, 60 (2) 293-312 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.00995.x
NEALE, R. N. (1964) THE USE OF ISOCHRON CHARTS IN SEISMIC REFRACTION INTERPRETATION*. Geophysical Prospecting, 12 (2) 215-224 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.1964.tb01898.x
Calvert, Rodney (2005) 4D technology: where are we, and where are we going?. Geophysical Prospecting, 53 (2) 161-171 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00469.x
Omofoma, Veronica, MacBeth, Colin, Amini, Hamed (2019) Intra-survey reservoir fluctuations - implications for quantitative 4D seismic analysis. Geophysical Prospecting, 67 (2) 282-297 doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12718
Sayers, C.M. (2005) Seismic anisotropy of shales. Geophysical Prospecting, 53 (5) 667-676 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2005.00495.x
Côrte, Gustavo; MacBeth, Colin (2025) The Intriguing 4D Seismic Signature of Reservoir Pore Collapse in Weakly Cemented Sandstones. Geophysical Prospecting, 73 (6). doi:10.1111/1365-2478.70057
Monsen, K., Johnstad, S.E. (2005) Improved understanding of velocity-saturation relationships using 4D computer-tomography acoustic measurements. Geophysical Prospecting, 53 (2) 173-181 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00464.x
Maleki, Masoud, Davolio, Alessandra, Schiozer, Denis José (2019) Quantitative integration of 3D and 4D seismic impedance into reservoir simulation model updating in the Norne Field. Geophysical Prospecting, 67 (1) 167-187 doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12717
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 4, 2025 11:06:25
Go to top of page