Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Zunyite vs. Molybdenite
It's the visually-unmistakable #zunyite vs the physically funky #molybdenite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Goussev, Serguei A., Peirce, John W. (2010) Magnetic basement: gravity-guided magnetic source depth analysis and interpretation. Geophysical Prospecting, 58 (2) 321-334 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00817.x

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleMagnetic basement: gravity-guided magnetic source depth analysis and interpretation
JournalGeophysical Prospecting
AuthorsGoussev, Serguei A.Author
Peirce, John W.Author
Year2010 (March)Volume58
Issue2
PublisherWiley
DOIdoi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00817.xSearch in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID990972Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:990972:8
GUID0
Full ReferenceGoussev, Serguei A., Peirce, John W. (2010) Magnetic basement: gravity-guided magnetic source depth analysis and interpretation. Geophysical Prospecting, 58 (2) 321-334 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00817.x
Plain TextGoussev, Serguei A., Peirce, John W. (2010) Magnetic basement: gravity-guided magnetic source depth analysis and interpretation. Geophysical Prospecting, 58 (2) 321-334 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00817.x
In(2010, March) Geophysical Prospecting Vol. 58 (2) Wiley

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

SMITH, R. A. (1959) SOME DEPTH FORMULAE FOR LOCAL MAGNETIC AND GRAVITY ANOMALIES. Geophysical Prospecting, 7 (1) 55-63 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.1959.tb01453.x
GAY, S. P. (1964) DISCUSSION OF "THE INTERPRETATION OF MAGNETIC ANOMALIES DUE TO DYKES"*. Geophysical Prospecting, 12 (3) 333-334 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.1964.tb01909.x
Salem, Ahmed (2011) Interpretation of magnetic data over tilted basement blocks: an example from the northern North Sea. Geophysical Prospecting, 59 (6) 1013-1020 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.00986.x
Dransfield, Mark (2010) Conforming Falcon gravity and the global gravity anomaly. Geophysical Prospecting, 58 (3) 469-483 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00830.x
HJELT, S.-E. (1975) ON THE POSSIBILITIES OF DETERMINING DIP IN MAGNETIC INTERPRETATION WITH THE INFINITELY DEEP PLATE MODEL*. Geophysical Prospecting, 23 (2) 323-334 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.1975.tb01532.x
GUNN, P. J. (1975) LINEAR TRANSFORMATIONS OF GRAVITY AND MAGNETIC FIELDS*. Geophysical Prospecting, 23 (2) 300-312 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.1975.tb01530.x
(1971) Gravity and Magnetic Interpretation of Rosemary Bank, North-East Atlantic. Geophysical Journal International, 24 (1) 51-58 doi:10.1111/j.1365-246x.1971.tb01846.x
WEELDEN, A. (1953) ON THE INTERPRETATION OF GRAVITY DATA*. Geophysical Prospecting, 1 (2) 75-81 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.1953.tb01133.x
(2010) Editorial. Geophysical Prospecting, 58 (2) 155-156 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00861.x
Martelet, G., Perrin, J., Truffert, C., Deparis, J. (2013) Fast mapping of magnetic basement depth, structure and nature using aeromagnetic and gravity data: combined methods and their application in the Paris Basin. Geophysical Prospecting, 61 (4) 857-873 doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12024
HJELT, S. E. (1974) A CONTRIBUTION TO THE QUANTITATIVE ERROR ANALYSIS IN MAGNETIC AND GRAVIMETRIC INTERPRETATION *. Geophysical Prospecting, 22 (3) 546-567 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.1974.tb00105.x
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are Β© OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 12, 2025 16:06:29
Go to top of page