Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Chrysotile vs. Pectolite
Two new minerals to launch this year's cup! Hazardous (but useful!) chrysotile faces off against stunning gem pectolite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Poletto, Flavio, Bellezza, Cinzia, Wapenaar, Kees, Craglietto, Aronne (2012) Virtual signals combination - phase analysis for 2D and 3D data representation (acoustic medium) Geophysical Prospecting, 60 (5) 838-854 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.01020.x

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleVirtual signals combination - phase analysis for 2D and 3D data representation (acoustic medium)
JournalGeophysical Prospecting
AuthorsPoletto, FlavioAuthor
Bellezza, CinziaAuthor
Wapenaar, KeesAuthor
Craglietto, AronneAuthor
Year2012 (September)Volume60
Issue5
PublisherWiley
DOIdoi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.01020.xSearch in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID991188Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:991188:2
GUID0
Full ReferencePoletto, Flavio, Bellezza, Cinzia, Wapenaar, Kees, Craglietto, Aronne (2012) Virtual signals combination - phase analysis for 2D and 3D data representation (acoustic medium) Geophysical Prospecting, 60 (5) 838-854 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.01020.x
Plain TextPoletto, Flavio, Bellezza, Cinzia, Wapenaar, Kees, Craglietto, Aronne (2012) Virtual signals combination - phase analysis for 2D and 3D data representation (acoustic medium) Geophysical Prospecting, 60 (5) 838-854 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.01020.x
In(2012, September) Geophysical Prospecting Vol. 60 (5) Wiley

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

Poletto, Flavio, Farina, Biancamaria, Böhm, Gualtiero, Wapenaar, Kees (2015) Seismic interferometry by tangent-phase correction. Geophysical Prospecting, 63 (3) 567-586 doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12209
Wapenaar, Kees, Broggini, Filippo, Snieder, Roel (2012) Creating a virtual source inside a medium from reflection data: heuristic derivation and stationary-phase analysis. Geophysical Journal International, 190 (2) 1020-1024 doi:10.1111/j.1365-246x.2012.05551.x
Poletto, Flavio, Farina, Biancamaria (2010) Synthesis of a seismic virtual reflector. Geophysical Prospecting, 58 (3) 375-387 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00829.x
Poletto, Flavio, Corubolo, Piero, Comelli, Paolo (2010) Drill-bit seismic interferometry with and without pilot signals. Geophysical Prospecting, 58 (2) 257-265 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00832.x
Wapenaar, Kees, van der Neut, Joost, Thorbecke, Jan (2012) On the relation between seismic interferometry and the simultaneous-source method. Geophysical Prospecting, 60 (4) 802-823 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2012.01056.x
Hunziker, Jürg, Slob, Evert, Fan, Yuanzhong, Snieder, Roel, Wapenaar, Kees (2012) Two-dimensional controlled-source electromagnetic interferometry by multidimensional deconvolution: spatial sampling aspects. Geophysical Prospecting, 60 (5) 974-994 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.01019.x
Holicki, Max, Drijkoningen, Guy, Wapenaar, Kees (2019) Acoustic directional snapshot wavefield decomposition. Geophysical Prospecting, 67 (1) 32-51 doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12700
Slob, Evert, Wapenaar, Kees, Treitel, Sven (2020) Tutorial: unified 1D inversion of the acoustic reflection response. Geophysical Prospecting, 68 (5) 1425-1442 doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12946
Bellezza, Cinzia, Poletto, Flavio (2014) Multidimensional deconvolution and processing of seismic-interferometry Arctic data. Geophysics, 79 (3) doi:10.1190/geo2013-0297.1
KINNEGING, N. A., BUDEJICKY, V., WAPENAAR, C. P. A., BERKHOUT, A. J. (1989) EFFICIENT 2D AND 3D SHOT RECORD REDATUMING1. Geophysical Prospecting, 37 (5) 493-530 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.1989.tb02220.x
van der Neut, Joost, Wapenaar, Kees (2015) Point-spread functions for interferometric imaging. Geophysical Prospecting, 63 (5) 1033-1049 doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12221
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 1, 2025 18:59:12
Go to top of page